While addressing a rally in Chhatisgarh, PM Modi said Congress and development cannot go hand in hand. PM Modi said, ‘Whenever Congress was in power, it derailed development’, casting doubt on the party’s ability to govern effectively.
He questioned the trustworthiness of Congress, linking it to the broader aspirations of the nation, particularly in states like Chhattisgarh.
#WATCH | Chhattisgarh: Addressing a public rally in Mahasamund, PM Modi says, "Today I have come from you to seek blessings for Viksit Bharat and Viksit Chhattisgarh. Today I have come among you to ask for something for me and I have faith in you. Every time I have asked you for… pic.twitter.com/ZIBTJSXavt
— ANI (@ANI) April 23, 2024
PM Modi emphasized the potential for development in Chhattisgarh, affirming his commitment to accelerating progress in the region. He assured the audience, ‘Chhattisgarh has the power to accelerate development. This is my guarantee to Chhattisgarh’, instilling confidence in the electorate.
Addressing security concerns, PM Modi pledged to combat Maoism and Naxalism, promising to uproot these challenges from the region.
Meanwhile, recently in a rally in Chhattisgarh’s Janjgir-Champa, Prime Minister Narendra Modi slammed the Congress party for its absence from the ‘pran pratishtha’ ceremony of the Ayodhya Ram temple on January 22 this year.
#WATCH | Chhattisgarh: Addressing a public rally in Janjgir-Champa, PM Narendra Modi says, "Congress considered itself greater than Lord Ram…Appeasement and vote bank politics are in the DNA of Congress…"#LokSabhaElections2024 pic.twitter.com/aQaOWSopop
— ANI (@ANI) April 23, 2024
Modi accused Congress leaders of considering themselves in superior to Lord Ram and disregarding the invitation, labeling it as disrespectful to Chhattisgarh and Mata Shabri, a revered figure in the Ramayana. He criticized Congress for what he termed as “appeasement politics,” stating that their actions disrespect the rights of Dalits, the poor, and Adivasis, while emphasizing his government’s focus on these marginalized groups.
Comments