Ritam Digital English
  • Home
  • Nation
  • World
  • Videos
    • Special Updates
    • Entertainment
    • Legal
    • Business
    • History
    • Viral Videos
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Food
    • Fashion
    • Viral
  • Sports
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Ritam Digital English
  • Home
  • Nation
  • World
  • Videos
    • Special Updates
    • Entertainment
    • Legal
    • Business
    • History
    • Viral Videos
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Food
    • Fashion
    • Viral
  • Sports
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Ritam Digital English
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Nation
  • World
  • Videos
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Sci & Tech
  • Sports
  • Opinion
Home Nation

In A First, Supreme Court Sets Historic Three-Month Deadline For President To Act On Bills Referred By Governor

The Supreme Court has said that the President of India must take a decision within three months on any bill that a Governor sends for approval

Editor Ritam English by Editor Ritam English
Apr 12, 2025, 12:28 pm IST
The Supreme Court has said that the President of India must take a decision within three months on any bill that a Governor sends for approval (PC: India Today)

The Supreme Court has said that the President of India must take a decision within three months on any bill that a Governor sends for approval (PC: India Today)

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegram

KEY POINTS

  • Supreme Court sets 3-month deadline for the President to decide on bills sent by Governors
  • No "pocket veto" allowed — the President cannot keep bills pending indefinitely
  • Delays beyond 3 months must come with valid, written reasons

For the first time, the Supreme Court has said that the President of India must take a decision within three months on any bill that a Governor sends for approval. This decision came following the Court looked into a case from Tamil Nadu, where the Governor had kept some bills pending without giving approval or rejecting them.

What the Supreme Court said:

As per Article 201 of the Constitution, if a Governor sends a bill to the President, the President has to either approve (give assent) or reject it. However, no time limit was mentioned in the Constitution for this. The Supreme Court has now made it very clear that the President cannot delay the decision for too long — there is no such thing as a “pocket veto” (which means keeping something pending forever without action).

PRESIDENT’S WITHHOLDING OF ASSENT CAN BE CHALLENGED

The Supreme Court has said that if the President or Governor does not take action on a bill within the given time, then the state government can go to court for help.

What else did the Supreme Court say?

If a bill is kept on hold because of doubts about whether it follows the Constitution, then the executive (like the Governor or President) should not decide on that. Such legal questions should be sent to the Supreme Court under Article 143, which allows the President to ask the court for advice on legal matters.

The court clearly said that only courts can decide whether a bill is constitutional or not — not the Governor or the President.

Why did the court say this?
This judgment came following the court ruled that Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi acted wrongly by not approving or rejecting 10 bills passed by the DMK government. The court said this kind of inaction is illegal and can be challenged in court.

It also reminded that Governors must act within a set time limit and cannot delay bills forever. This ruling makes sure that Governors and the President act on time, and that only the courts can decide legal questions about laws.

Source: Supreme Court, Bills, SC
Tags: Supreme CourtPresident of IndiaArticle 201
ShareTweetSendShare

Related News

India Neutralises System At Lahore (PC: India Today)
Nation

Operation Sindoor 2.0: India Neutralises System At Lahore, Targets Air Defence Units Across Pakistan

Pakistan Army’s Presence at Terrorist Funerals Raises Alarming Questions About State Support for Terrorism
Nation

Pakistan Army’s Presence at Terrorist Funerals Raises Alarming Questions About State Support for Terrorism

Pakistan Attacks Foiled: How India’s Swift 26-Minute Strike Destroyed Terror Bases in Pakistan and PoK
Nation

Pakistan Attacks Foiled: How India’s Swift 26-Minute Strike Destroyed Terror Bases in Pakistan and PoK

India’s Secret Weapon In Operation Sindoor (PC: AP)
Nation

India Used Loitering Munition For The First Time In Operation Sindoor, What Is Loitering Munition ?

From Balakot to Sindoor: How Did India Evolve from Restraint to Preemptive Strikes?
Nation

From Balakot to Sindoor: How Did India Evolve from Restraint to Preemptive Strikes?

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Ritam Digital Media Foundation. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

India Neutralises System At Lahore (PC: India Today)

Operation Sindoor 2.0: India Neutralises System At Lahore, Targets Air Defence Units Across Pakistan

Pakistan Army’s Presence at Terrorist Funerals Raises Alarming Questions About State Support for Terrorism

Pakistan Army’s Presence at Terrorist Funerals Raises Alarming Questions About State Support for Terrorism

Pakistan Attacks Foiled: How India’s Swift 26-Minute Strike Destroyed Terror Bases in Pakistan and PoK

Pakistan Attacks Foiled: How India’s Swift 26-Minute Strike Destroyed Terror Bases in Pakistan and PoK

India’s Secret Weapon In Operation Sindoor (PC: AP)

India Used Loitering Munition For The First Time In Operation Sindoor, What Is Loitering Munition ?

Exposing Pakistan’s Lies: A List of 7 Absurd Claims Made By Attaullah Tarar On TV

Exposing Pakistan’s Lies: A List of 7 Absurd Claims Made By Attaullah Tarar On TV

From Balakot to Sindoor: How Did India Evolve from Restraint to Preemptive Strikes?

From Balakot to Sindoor: How Did India Evolve from Restraint to Preemptive Strikes?

Nine terror targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied J&K were destroyed (PC: NDTV)

Operation Sindoor: Centre Holds All Party Leaders Day Following Action On Pakistan Terror Sites

India’s Operation Sindoor Exposes Pakistan’s Economic Weakness- Is Collapse Next?

India’s Operation Sindoor Exposes Pakistan’s Economic Weakness- Is Collapse Next?

The Opposition had declared it was in sync with the government (PC: ANI)

Why Opposition’s Backing Of ‘Operation Sindoor’ Marks A Shift From 2016 And Balakot Reactions

Prime Minister Narendra Modi with National Security Advisor Ajit Doval in New Delhi (PC: ANI)

PM Modi Hails ‘Operation Sindoor’ In Cabinet Meeting: Matter Of Great Pride

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© Ritam Digital Media Foundation.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Nation
  • World
  • Videos
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Sci & Tech
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • About & Policies
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Disclaimer

© Ritam Digital Media Foundation.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies