The Supreme Court has taken a firm stand against Udhayanidhi Stalin for his disgraceful remarks on Sanatana Dharma, which he shamelessly compared to diseases like dengue and malaria. This move by the court reflects a strong message that such contemptuous statements will not be tolerated, especially when they hurt the sentiments of millions who hold Sanatana Dharma in deep reverence.
A Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar made it clear that the various First Information Reports (FIRs) filed against Udhayanidhi Stalin cannot be handled lightly. The court decided that these cases would need to be tried outside Tamil Nadu, indicating a lack of confidence in the local judiciary’s ability to handle such a sensitive matter impartially. This decision is a clear blow to Udhayanidhi’s attempts to evade accountability in his home state, where he wields considerable influence.
In a further setback for Udhayanidhi Stalin, the Supreme Court demanded that he suggest a convenient location for these cases to be tried during the next hearing, scheduled for November. This directive underscores the court’s intention to ensure that justice is served without bias, no matter where the cases are eventually heard.
The court’s firm stance is a direct response to Udhayanidhi’s blatant disregard for the feelings of those who practice Sanatana Dharma, an ancient and respected tradition in India.
Udhayanidhi Stalin had initially sought to club the FIRs filed against him under Article 32 of the Constitution, a move that was seen by many as an attempt to escape the consequences of his own irresponsible statements.
However, the Supreme Court, in its wisdom, directed him to seek relief under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). This section allows for the transfer of criminal cases from one High Court to another, ensuring that Udhayanidhi cannot manipulate the legal process to his advantage.
The court also granted Udhayanidhi an exemption from personally appearing before the courts in the states where these cases have been filed. While this may seem like a small victory for him, it does nothing to diminish the gravity of the situation he finds himself in. The Supreme Court’s decision is a strong reminder that no one, regardless of their political clout or position, is above the law.
Udhayanidhi Stalin’s reckless and disrespectful remarks on Sanatana Dharma have rightfully attracted widespread condemnation. His attempts to belittle a faith that has been the cornerstone of Indian civilization for millennia are both reprehensible and unforgivable. The Supreme Court’s firm action against him is a step in the right direction, ensuring that such irresponsible behavior does not go unpunished.
Comments