Ritam Digital English
  • Home
  • Nation
  • World
  • Videos
    • Special Updates
    • Entertainment
    • Legal
    • Business
    • History
    • Viral Videos
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Food
    • Fashion
    • Viral
  • Sports
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Ritam Digital English
  • Home
  • Nation
  • World
  • Videos
    • Special Updates
    • Entertainment
    • Legal
    • Business
    • History
    • Viral Videos
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Food
    • Fashion
    • Viral
  • Sports
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Ritam Digital English
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Nation
  • World
  • Videos
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Sci & Tech
  • Sports
  • Opinion
Home World

Donald Trump removed from Colorado ballot in historic ruling by state’s Supreme Court

The Court decided to declare the former president ineligible for the White House under the US Constitution's insurrection clause

Editor Ritam English by Editor Ritam English
Dec 20, 2023, 11:44 am IST
FacebookTwitterWhatsAppTelegram

The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.

“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.

The decision comes from a group of justices who were all appointed by Democratic governors and thus, marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.

“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.

Colorado’s highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.

The court has put a stay on its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case. Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.

“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” wrote the court’s majority. “We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”

Trump’s attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters.

Several spokespersons for Trump across forums have condemned the decision. Trump’s legal spokeswoman Alina Habba said in a statement Tuesday night: “This ruling, issued by the Colorado Supreme Court, attacks the very heart of this nation’s democracy. It will not stand, and we trust that the Supreme Court will reverse this unconstitutional order.” Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel labeled the decision “Election interference” and said the RNC’s legal team intends to help Trump fight the ruling.

Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesn’t need the state to win next year’s presidential election.However, it is being speculated that more courts and election officials will follow Colorado’s lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.

Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.

The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.

Trump’s attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to “officers of the United States” who take an oath to “support” the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an “officer of the United States” elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.

The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others “under the United States,” but doesn’t name the presidency.

The state’s highest court didn’t agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine that the framers of the amendment, fearful of former confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.

“President Trump asks us to hold that Section 3 disqualifies every oathbreaking insurrectionist except the most powerful one and that it bars oath-breakers from virtually every office, both state and federal, except the highest one in the land,” the court’s majority opinion said. “Both results are inconsistent with the plain language and history of Section 3.”

The left-leaning group that brought the Colorado case, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, hailed the ruling.

“Our Constitution clearly states that those who violate their oath by attacking our democracy are barred from serving in government,” its president, Noah Bookbinder, said in a statement.

Trump’s attorneys also had urged the Colorado high court to reverse Wallace’s ruling that Trump incited the Jan. 6 attack. His lawyers argued the then-president had simply been using his free speech rights and hadn’t called for violence. Trump attorney Scott Gessler also argued the attack was more of a “riot” than an insurrection.

The court in its ruling dismissed the arguments that Trump wasn’t responsible for his supporters’ violent attack, which was intended to halt Congress’ certification of the presidential vote: “President Trump then gave a speech in which he literally exhorted his supporters to fight at the Capitol,” they wrote.

Colorado Supreme Court Justices Richard L. Gabriel, Melissa Hart, Monica Márquez and Hood ruled for the petitioners. The Colorado ruling stands in contrast with the Minnesota Supreme Court, which last month decided that the state party can put anyone it wants on its primary ballot. It dismissed a Section 3 lawsuit but said the plaintiffs could try again during the general election.

Tags: Donald Trumpformer US President Donald TrumpTrump banned from Colorado ballot
ShareTweetSendShare

Related News

Iran-Israel Ceasefire Breach | Iran Launches Missiles At Israel | PM Modi On Operation Sindoor
Nation

Iran-Israel Ceasefire Breach | Iran Launches Missiles At Israel | PM Modi On Operation Sindoor

PM Modi’s India’s Prime Asset: Shashi Tharoor | Pawan Kalyan | Diljit Dosanjh | Iran Israel war
Nation

PM Modi’s India’s Prime Asset: Shashi Tharoor | Pawan Kalyan | Diljit Dosanjh | Iran Israel war

PM Modi’s G7 Talks: How Global Ties Are Powering India’s Growth in Infrastructure, Defence & Innovation
World

PM Modi’s G7 Talks: How Global Ties Are Powering India’s Growth in Infrastructure, Defence & Innovation

LA Erupts Over ICE Raids: All You Need to Know About Trump’s Military Crackdown and Nationwide Protests
World

LA Erupts Over ICE Raids: All You Need to Know About Trump’s Military Crackdown and Nationwide Protests

Hindu homes set on fire by Muslim mob in Jessore (PC: OpIndia)
World

No End To Atrocities: Hindus Targeted Again In Bangladesh Under Yunus Rule

Comments

The comments posted here/below/in the given space are not on behalf of Ritam Digital Media Foundation. The person posting the comment will be in sole ownership of its responsibility. According to the central government's IT rules, obscene or offensive statement made against a person, religion, community or nation is a punishable offense, and legal action would be taken against people who indulge in such activities.

Latest News

78 Years Ago Today, British Parliament Passed Indian Independence Act

78 Years Ago Today, British Parliament Passed Indian Independence Act

July 4, 1947: The Secret Turning Point That Led to India’s Historic Independence a Month Later

July 4, 1947: The Secret Turning Point That Led to India’s Historic Independence a Month Later

The Death of Swami Vivekananda: A Legacy Beyond Mortality

The Death of Swami Vivekananda: A Legacy Beyond Mortality

The Sedition Trial of Bal Gangadhar Tilak in 1897: A Watershed in Colonial India’s Repression of Dissent

The Sedition Trial of Bal Gangadhar Tilak in 1897: A Watershed in Colonial India’s Repression of Dissent

Shimla Agreement: The Untold Realities Behind a Defining Indo-Pak Treaty

Shimla Agreement: The Untold Realities Behind a Defining Indo-Pak Treaty

A Nation’s Healer and Builder: The Inspiring Legacy of Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy

A Nation’s Healer and Builder: The Inspiring Legacy of Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy

What RSS Has Done for Families: From Promoting Fertility to Strengthening Family Values Through Kutumb Prabodhan

What RSS Has Done for Families: From Promoting Fertility to Strengthening Family Values Through Kutumb Prabodhan

How ‘Make in India’ Transformed Indian Manufacturing: A Decade of Massive Growth

How ‘Make in India’ Transformed Indian Manufacturing: A Decade of Massive Growth

Iran-Israel Ceasefire | PM Modi Praises Shubhanshu Shukla | Kharge Criticizes Tharoor | Cloudburst

Iran-Israel Ceasefire | PM Modi Praises Shubhanshu Shukla | Kharge Criticizes Tharoor | Cloudburst

Axiom-4 Mission Launch | Shubhanshu Shukla | 50 Years of Emergency | Iran-Israel Ceasefire News

Axiom-4 Mission Launch | Shubhanshu Shukla | 50 Years of Emergency | Iran-Israel Ceasefire News

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Disclaimer

© Ritam Digital Media Foundation.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Nation
  • World
  • Videos
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Sci & Tech
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • About & Policies
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Disclaimer

© Ritam Digital Media Foundation.
Tech-enabled by Ananthapuri Technologies