In a recent development following the defamation case against former President Donald Trump, E. Jean Carroll’s attorney, Shawn Crowley, has hinted at the possibility of filing a third lawsuit. This comes after Trump was ordered to pay Carroll $83.3 million in damages by a New York City jury for defamatory remarks made against her.
Speaking on MSNBC’s ‘Inside With Jen Psaki,’ Crowley responded to Trump’s remarks at a Michigan rally where he denied knowing Carroll and criticized the lawsuits against him as “unfair.” Trump’s statements prompted Crowley to assert that they were lies and defamatory, emphasizing that two federal juries had found Trump guilty of sexual assault against Carroll.
Crowley expressed disappointment that the substantial damages awarded in the recent case did not deter Trump from targeting Carroll again. She emphasized that Trump’s inability to control himself indicated a potential for further legal action to hold him accountable for his actions.
Carroll herself had previously hinted at the possibility of additional lawsuits. During an interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, Carroll affirmed her willingness to pursue further legal action if advised by her lawyers. This underscores the determination to seek justice against Trump’s defamatory behavior.
The recent verdict ordered Trump to pay $83.3 million in damages, comprising compensatory, reputational repair, and punitive penalties. This follows a previous defamation case in May, where Trump was ordered to pay Carroll $5 million for similar denials of her accusations.
Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing and has stated his intention to appeal the recent verdict. However, the legal proceedings highlight the accountability faced by public figures for their actions and statements, particularly in cases of defamation and sexual assault allegations.
The ongoing legal battle between E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump underscores broader issues of accountability, justice, and the rights of survivors of sexual assault. As the case continues to unfold, it raises questions about the responsibilities of public figures and the efficacy of legal mechanisms in addressing defamation and misconduct allegations.
Comments